Certification for IRB Professionals (CIP) Practice Exam 2025 – The All-in-One Guide for Success!

A full board meeting might be required by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) when there are significant ethical concerns or potential for considerable risk associated with the research. This is because a full board review allows for a comprehensive examination of the study by all members of the board, ensuring that multiple perspectives are considered regarding the ethical implications and risks to the participants.

In studies where the risks are greater than minimal, or when the ethical considerations are particularly complex, such as those involving vulnerable populations or sensitive data, a full board review is crucial. It helps ensure that all ethical considerations are thoroughly discussed and that decisions are made with the input of the entire IRB, which promotes a higher level of scrutiny and oversight.

The other options do not reflect scenarios that would typically warrant a full board review. When research involves minimal risk to subjects or only standard procedures, expedited review processes may be adequate. Moreover, the IRB's focus is on ethical review and participant safety rather than expediting the approval process, which means a meeting isn't held to simply speed things up, regardless of any concerns.